Can We Prevent The Ruin of the West?

How Puppet Masters Keep Us Fighting Each Other

You really can see sad income inequality in the UK. Not to put a downer on this before even writing it but, most of us have little trust in the system - it's not just because of the failing services or the country's political polarization either. Nope, it's the social cohesion, unity's gone. Doesn't it make you think the entire West is undergoing a collapse? Okay, enough of that! But yeah, it really is going down.

The Way Forward: Stop Playing Their Game

7 min read 

Let's cut the bollocks and get to the simple truth. The average person in Britain, America, China, Russia, or anywhere else wants the same basic things - safety, prosperity, dignity, and peace for their families. 14.4 million people in the UK live in poverty, and 13.8% of households are food insecure, see here. These are real problems, not culture war nonsense.

The average British family wants:

1. Affordable food shopping
2. Bills they can actually pay
3. Safe streets for their kids
4. Decent schools
5. Maybe a holiday that doesn't require selling a kidney! 

The system is dividing us and it serves the interests of fewer, but yet, more powerful human beings. We know some of those in positions of power dissociate from us; they convince themselves that normal moral constraints don't fully apply to their 'necessary' work of managing the populace. Look at the psychology behind shit like Tony Blair's Dossier for WMD, America's Project Northwoods, MKUltra, Operation Crossroads and our ugly Post Office Horizon Scandal. 

The Sage vs. Modern Rage

Right, let's start with something that'll ruffle more feathers than December's turkey market. Christian patriots waving flags and invoking Jesus for Britain? They've got the wrong bloke entirely.

For the sake of 'keeping it real,' the historical Jesus (you know what I mean), I'm not talking about the third century ancient fan edited version! This gentleman lived in Galilee - during his ministry it came under Northern Palestine, a multicultural spot. Yeah, strange how Jesus was Palestinian but also a Jewish man (not being political). The geezer was a very spiritual figure, operating under a brutal Roman occupation. On that note, we shouldn't deny humanism's contributions to British morality, as well as, other things like stoicism, or the old golden rule, our morality is not exclusive to the church, civilised ethics existed BCE. 

• Nazareth was a tiny village of maybe 400 people at a guess, where Aramaic-speaking Jews rubbed shoulders with Greek-speaking gentiles

• Jesus taught down in Capernaum by the Sea of Galilee - fishing town full of tax collectors, Roman soldiers, and mixed ethnicities

• His message was dead simple: Love God, love your neighbour, and put compassion into action, especially for the marginalised.

What Jesus never said was: 'Wave flags for our country' or 'countrymen with opposing views are the enemy!'

Regardless of what his prosecution charge was supposed to be; he didn't use threatening language against Pilate or raise an army against Rome; go and check, search for Biblical and historical sources for aggression aimed at Rome. If you start stripping away the theological embellishments you'll find a more grounded historical figure; someone more likely to ask today's Christian nationalists to chill out a bit.

We rebranded the guy into a white European and the cross has long since been an idol used for political control and influence. 

The Puppet Masters: Meet Your Overlords

While the internet argues what a woman is or debates if illegal immigration is wrong, real families are wondering how they'll pay the gas bill. The same elite networks that have been pulling strings for decades are watching us suffer while we pick sides. This post is not about religion and I'm really not trying to promote politics, just how it maintains their illusion. 

Bohemian Grove: Where Power Goes Spooky

Bare with the 'tinfoil hat' optics a moment and picture every Republican president since 1923, plus various influential figures from the Supreme Court, corporate world giants, and media moguls, right? Thousands of these powerhouses have been gathering in California redwoods to perform a ritual every twelve months! It even has a name: 'Cremation of Care.' They literally burn away all cares about the outside world in a weird ritual symbolically akin to baptism in front of a giant owl statue. Yeah, okay, it sounds loony tunes, so what? The theatrics are distracting.

That owl? People say it represents Athena, also known as: Venus, Ishtar, Isis, Inanna, Lilith, the Morning Star, closely associated with Lucifer! But really, whether you take that literally or metaphorically, the message has led to mountains of speculative accusations from planning world domination, satanism to child sacrifice. Why? Well, world elites who castaway normal moral constraints for a 'greater good' is sensational and interesting. Of course, it implies the nefarious, cognitive empathy over emotional hindrance, and it's creepy. Still, fact or fiction, owls and robes aren't the sodding danger!!

The Manhattan Project was planned there! A fact. Nuclear weapons. Decided by blokes who'd just cremated their cares!

The grove the Bohemian Club's property. The Bohemians are part of a larger Bilderberg Merry-Go-Round of conspiracies, likely because it's the same faces, just different venues. So what about conspiracy? When the world's most powerful all gather under complete media blackout it's not to play a Street Fighter championship, is it? 

Speaking candidly, suspicion and conspiracy theory is divided by a line of stigma! Any posthumous allegation or unusual witness statement will usually turn to jelly and just sit there, maybe giving the occasional wobble. A grey area. Paul Bonacci openly said he was a victim at Bohemian Grove in Yorkshire TV's 'Conspiracy of Silence,' but after being convicted himself his claim was discredited. He still wobbles occassionally. It's worth asking yourself: Would new suspicions of child trafficking end up being down prioritised in the Grove today, considering the reputation and historical sensationalism? Absolutely. Does it mean child abuse has always been unlikely to happen there? Duh, no. Does it detract from what is really happening? Yes.

The following three men frequented The Bilderberg Group Meetings and Bohemian Grove. I hope it conveys power and attitude:

• David Rockefeller: Trilateral Commission founder. Western plus Japan cooperation and diplomacy

• Henry Kissinger: Escalated Vietnam War and Negotiated its end. Won a Nobel Peace Prize. Supported Authoritarian Regimes. 

• Zbigniew Brzezinski: The man who authorized CIA support for Afghan fighters against the Soviets, contributing to later extremist groups

The Division Machine: Who Profits Most?

Here's the thing that'll bake your noodle: division is how we are controlled. Algorithms across the internet are great for elite networks which seem to 'Cambridge Analytica' us all as either 'woke communist traitors' or 'fascist racist bigots.'

It's the nature of the beast; algorithms are already designed to promote content that gets the most engagement, and nothing gets a reaction like a political screaming match! It's a self-perpetuating machine managed by social engineers. It is so easy.

This isn't totally organic. Normal people aren't naturally this fucking mental. But division keeps us from asking awkward questions like 'Why are we giving millions away in foreign aid when my nan has to use a food bank?'  

The Enemy From Outside

We all know it's mostly China and Russia. The U.S. defence budget alone is over $886 billion a year. The top five U.S. defence contractors make tens of billions in revenue!

Nowadays, China will likely spy on us, threaten our media because of its perceived unsuitable coverage, or hit our governance with cyber-disruption. Jaguar Land Rover and M&S were hit recently, NHS a few years ago.

However, long before we nicked that Russian spying on Queen Elizabeth II, they had already been chipping away at us for some time. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion the book Russia fabricated in 1903 has spread globally. The Nazi party made use of it, look how that turned out. Then there was the cyber-attacks, not forgetting 'Doctors Plot' in the fifties and the 'Salisbury poisoning' in 2018 and the 'Litvinenko poisoning' in 2006.

The Manufactured Patriots: When Grassroots Aren't So Grassroots

Coming back to the sizable patriotic demonstrations we've been seeing, don't they have suspiciously good organisation and funding? Worth asking: who benefits from channelling genuine grievances into convenient political movements?

Take a political movement that paints itself as being outside the system. It's fighting for us, the people, not the establishment. Be that as it is; sound systems, massive screens, celebrities, and even a cooky billionaire?! Elon Musk made sure to push his grievance about 'impending violence'. 

Who paid for all that bollocks? Why is a man worth a quarter of a trillion dollars leading a so-called 'grassroots' movement? Really? Why did people listen to Katie Hopkins, Why did their message sound so tired and condescending? 

We're told to see these protests as the people's voice, but it's not a conspiracy theory to wonder why a figure with his own space exploration program is involved with left vs Right wing tensions in UK politics? 

Apparently, according to various people I've listened to in life, the textbook manipulation to watch out for is distraction; using incidents, media or authentic movements to redirect attention away. Even Greco-Roman power used controlled opposition that served them while appearing to challenge it. Julius Caesar's First Triumvirate, for example. 

Is that it? Hell no! Debt trap diplomacy using trade and loans for dependency, resource and supply route control, infiltrating education, manipulation of supply vulnerabilities, tech theft. Today we see hybrid warfare (cyber, economic, information warfare) alongside traditional field combat its multi-factored and leaders have to listen to elite multinationals who bring yet another dimension. 

Labour's Grooming Gang Cover-Up: Sacrifice in Action

Nothing shows human sacrifice like Labour's handling of industrial-scale child abuse. I'm not thinking alters and daggers, but a sacrifice to the gods of woke only to simply avoid appearing racist. Official inquiries and the government jiffer-jaff is well known now. 

Conclusion

Here's the really sinister bit: these secret groups and networks don't just take a slice of power, they pay for it through transgressional bonding, designed to forge unbreakable loyalty. They can also operate in religious circles and cults, let's ignore the prophetical red heifers and end-time jackanory plots in the Middle East

Bohemian Grove: Mock human sacrifice rituals and unsubstantiated allegations of child trafficking

Skull And Bones: Secret oaths formed by world leaders, media moguls, business tycoons leading to form life long bonds

Epstein network: Documented blackmail through sexual compromise

Bilderberg Group: Alleged coordinated deception of entire populations

Group of Thirty (G30) Ultra Elite Bank Governors who have control of world economics

Is there a class of wrong minded people psychologically capable of doing the fubar? This isn't Christian, Secular or Islamic, neither is it every day common decency. So how do we, the ordinary people build enough power to challenge things? As we know, voting every few years isn't cutting it. Ignore the radicals, the fringe, the extreme and be compassionate. Unite. Make politics boring again. 

Is Britains DEI Dodgy?

Britain's £50 Million Diversity Question

The UK has been coughing up over £50 million a year on diversity, equity and inclusion programs (DEI). Here's an uncomfortable question: Are they actually working or are we throwing bundles of cash at a fire only to make flames?

This isn't about whether DEI principles matter—of course they do. I'm just asking if it's wise to splash out on morally prestigious awards when other options exist. 

5 min read

The Financial Investment

The numbers are getting harder to ignore:

Local councils: Research from the TaxPayers' Alliance show the cost of DEI roles almost doubled from just over £12 million in 2020/21 to almost £23 million in 2022/23!

Government: Diversity managers often earn in excess of £40k, while the rest of us are expected to accept austerity! UK LinkedIn data from 2020 shows almost twice as many diversity and inclusion workers as many other countries.

What is the Research Saying? 

This is more than just a political talking point for weddings and funerals, the government's own research is sounding the alarm. The official Inclusion at Work Panel report (2024), concluded that many DEI programs are being implemented without any proof that they work, this shows they can be counter-productive! Not good, especially who lost disability benefits. 

Even though employers might want to ‘do the right thing,’ they are ‘resorting to ineffective practices that can be polarising.’ Our own governments research says diversity and inclusion isn't even working. Yet evidently the spending keeps sky rocketting! 

On The Other Hand

The supporters of these programs will say that they tackle hidden prejudices, that change requires sustained investment. Fair enough, if that's how best intentions appear where's the evidence to show how it works?

If we go on research from the likes of the London School of Economics (LSE) we can get some clear facts. In a 2024 study they found that having a diverse workforce is associated with stronger long-term market performance!

The analysis from McKinsey & Company conclude that companies with plenty of women and ethnic minorities will likely bring employers above-average profitability. 

These are valid points. However the question remains: are current DEI methods benefitting the public? Is it doing what it says on the tin? 

Don't be an Appalled Paul

What People Actually Experience:

•  At Work: Despite all the money spent, an Ipsos poll in 2025 uncovered deep divisions in public opinion. While there is widespread support for specific things like flexible working, 36% of Britons believe DEI efforts have ‘gone too far.’ To be fair the view is particularly strong among men (43%), those over 55 (47%), and people from white backgrounds (38%). 

• At University: The anecdotes of ‘walking on eggshells’ and feeling more divided after diversity training are common. 

The focus on demographic differences increases segregation rather than foster genuine integration. Separate ceremonies and support groups for people of different backgrounds still continue! 

The Bigger Picture

These numbers often fail to show real progress. For example, while the Civil Service has increased its number of ethnic minority workers, the number of those workers in the most senior leadership roles still lag behind the overall population. We might argue it demonstrates how programs and higher costs do not always equal better results.

The Self-Perpetuating Problem

Diversity consultation is a big business today. Consultants profit when they find inclusion, diversity and equity problems, and of course, their departments will grow when they document inequality. 

There is financial incentive for peoples problems to continue, not for them to be solved. NHS Individual Placement and Support (IPS) workers are incentivised to find sustainable jobs for the unemployed who may not even be ready for employment!

What Actually Works: A Path Forward

Why should the path to genuine progress be about abandoning the goal of equality? We should shift resources from the more bureaucratic roles to tangible solutions, ones with a proven track record:

•  Address real barriers: For instance, rather than having DEI services, committees and so on, why not pay for a young person from a low-income family to train as a firefighter or a welder? That will attract more diverse individuals from various backgrounds.

• Build shared purpose: Make common goals and shared values count, don't emphasise demographic differences.

•  Measure results: Track real outcomes, promotion rates and pay gap closures.

•  Let relationships develop naturally: When we force interactions they backfire.

The Bottom Line

We've been presented with a system that increases racial and social class awareness while claiming to reduce these things when they don’t. If we want effective DEI support someone should reform it. The stakes are too high for virtue signalling culture.

After years of division, our towns and cities need something that is genuinely effective. Repeating the same thing while expecting different results isn't progressive—it's just expensive madness.

Conclusion

The demand for these DEI services is driven by both corporate and public pressure, but not the proven results we need to drive this forward. DEI is circulating the problems they hope to end, it has created wealthy people another profitable market! 

It's a ‘badge of virtue’ that every company wants to wear. DEI is a strong moral imperative, however, charging money for a training award without knowing whether or not the programs actually work isn't ethical.  

The irony is that DEI services widen inequality gaps, which is classism caught red handed: Professional-class solutions for working-class problems. They entrench the hierarchy further as professional administrators who oversee inequality instead of ending it. 

Monstrous Mates of our Monarchs

The Royal Circle: What Did They Know and When?

Is There Elite Immunity or Institutional Protection? 

8 min read 

What kind of country do we live in? Do you see those interconnecting webs? All the dodgy circles that link to certain VIPs and Royalty? We can't definitively say for sure what was known by who, or when they knew it; we can, however, examine some of the strange friendships our Royalty has kept. 

The Jimmy Savile Connection: A Close Royal Friendship

Perhaps the most well-known of these creepy friendships would be him,  Savile. He had a decades-long relationship with King Charles when was Prince of Wales. It wasn't just a casual acquaintance - Savile got close and Charles sought his advice on public relations matters.

The PR Consultant to Royalty

Savile even put together a PR handbook for the Royal Family, this level of trust and access for anyone, let alone a notorious molester of children is quite remarkable in hindsight. This kind of access reveals a relationship built over many years with significant trust on both sides. It is quite reminiscent of Clement Freud asking his son Matthew for PR assistance with the McCann case in Praia da Luz (2007). Public Relations is a very powerful thing. 

Warning Signs Were There

What still sparks this up as particularly scary even years later, was that there were warning signs. Dickie Arbiter, a former royal aide, later described Savile's behavior around young female staff at St. James's Palace as 'creepy' and 'suspect.' 

The Key Question

If a royal aide noticed this behaviour, it raises questions about what others might have heard. Were these concerns passed up the chain of command? People in the BBC knew Savile liked young girls, it was a common unspoken secret. They even sent cars to collect children for him. 

The police, security and intelligence agencies would definitely have known about Savile, but apparently, no one informed the royals, unlike with those previous embarassments involving nazism or learning disabled family members which the palace actually hid. 

What the Official Inquiries Found

The official inquiries after Savile's death found no evidence that Prince Charles or other senior royals had direct knowledge of his criminal activities. Is that really a surprising? Either way, here's where it gets complicated.

The Problem with the Investigations

They were criticized for not fully grasping the extent of institutional cover-ups that enabled Savile for decades. If the official investigations missed the broader picture, what else might have been overlooked?

Other Troubling Associations: The Mountbatten Allegations

The Savile case isn't isolated. Lord Mountbatten introduced Savile to Charles, who quickly took to him. Mountbatten, Prince Philip's uncle and mentor to Prince Charles, faced posthumous allegations of sexual abuse of children. 

The Kincora Connection

Arthur Smyth claimed that Mountbatten abused him at the Kincora Boys' Home in Northern Ireland during the 1970s. These are allegations in a real legal case, not proven facts, but this is another part of an interwoven tapestry which depicts an emerging theme.

The building was eventually knocked down. 

The Peter Ball Situation: 1993 Police Caution

The Peter Ball situation is perhaps the most problematic of all, mainly because of what happened after concerns were raised. Ball, a former bishop, was given a police caution in 1993 for sexual offenses. Despite this caution, Charles continued their friendship. Ball returned to ministry within a couple of years. Bizarrely, the prince provided him with financial support and accommodation on the Duchy of Cornwall estate during the 2000s. Sadly, this is yet another unconventional relationship.

Charlie's Explanation

Charles eventually said he was 'deceived' by Ball and didn't grasp that accepting a police caution meant admitting guilt. While this explanation is possible, it raises questions about the advice Charles was receiving from his top level staff. This holds some similarity to the more recent Justin Welby situation, the Archbishop of Canterbury and another 'friend'  of Charles. Along with other clergy, Welby covered up the abuse of around 130 boys and young men. 

What the Inquiry Found

Going back to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, it found no evidence to suggest Charles tried to influence police investigations. However, the continued support of his ex-bishop friend, Peter Ball, after the 1993 caution the public developed some misgivings.

We must remember who and what was being held to account with these investigative motions - the highest and most powerful of the UK. Of course the official narrative caused a few side glances, but all reports and proceedings trickled top down from a sovereign nation. 

The Mentor's Dark Secret: Laurens van der Post

Laurens van der Post was like a longterm spiritual mentor for Charles. This South African writer was an influence on Charles and was made godfather to Prince William. After van der Post's death in 1996, it emerged he fathered a child with a 14-year-old girl. He was in his fifties when it happened. 

The Warning That Went Unheeded: The Royal Portrait Commission

Perhaps most telling is the Rolf Harris case. In 2005, The Australian artist painted a portrait of Queen Elizabeth II for her 80th birthday. It was a prestigious commission. 

Here's what's particularly off, yet again - a victim wrote to Buckingham Palace with a warning about Harris's predatory behavior. The letter was supposedly filed away until 2012 when it was used as part of Operation Yewtree.

Why This Matters

This case is significant. We can see direct warnings to the Royal Household. Yet, according to the official narrative the royalty was unaware. That in itself should make you question who is manipulating who? Has an ostrich with its head in the sand popped up in your head yet? 

What This All Means: The Official Position

Look, we can't say with certainty what members of the Royal Family knew about any of these criminals or their activities. The royals were portrayed as oblivious and that is a very poor public image indeed. No formal inquiry produced evidence to say Charles knew the gravity of the crimes surrounding those men or even of any corresponding rumours. An ostrich conveys a modicum of humour, but prosecutors, investigators, victims and their loved ones did not find it funny.

The Pattern Is Hard to Ignore

Multiple individuals with close ties to particular monarchs were later convicted of serious sexual offenses. There were warning signs, concerns raised by staff, and in at least one case, a direct warning to the Palace. Is just one rumour of child abuse enough to curse a house in your community? So what's going on here? 

What The Evidence Suggests

This doesn't prove a cover-up or any type of deliberate enabling, but it does suggest an awful lack of due diligence when it came to the questionable company they kept, at the very least. Something was off. The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) was critical. The IICSA report branded Prince Charles as 'misguided' and said Ball was an example of how a senior Anglican church member 'was able to sexually abuse vulnerable teenagers and young men for decades', but is that a fair summary? 

The Uncomfortable Truth

Whether it's playing dumb, institutional protection of reputation over the victims, or simply terrible judgment, the Royal Family's associations with dubious individuals still do raise legitimate questions: what did they know? 

But Who Was Targetting Who?

Prince Charles was known for wanting people to like him. He was eager to be loved like Princess Diana was, the peoples princess. He lived an isolated, emotionally impoverished childhood and walked the halls of prestige and power; status most psychopaths greatly desire.

Psychopathy, sociopathy or antisocial personality disorder are known for aggression, they often involve abuse. Many other dark psychologies and sinister mentalities exist that are attracted to exerting power over vulnerable or weaker people. Dont believe child abuse has a sexual limitation, it often holds a sadistic link to domination - power is the flame to that moth. There was something missing in Charles's life, and evidently each wolf in sheeps clothing respectively offered him something in order to befriend him: public relations skills, mentoring, spiritual advice, marriage guidance and so on, and so forth. 

Let’s keep things real by acknowledging that the exact specifics of these royal friendships may bever be known. But the documented connections and the handling of various warning signs can't be written off as coincidence can they? Something was definitely kept out the public spotlight!

What Really Happened: The 'Far-Right' Labels That Don't Add Up

History: Their Own Signs Told the Story - 'Not Far-Right, Just Right! 

4 to 5 min read

The Racism of the Anti-Racist: What's Really Going On? 

Why should fears of unknown illegal settlers make you 'far-right'? Yet, a year before posting this, Keir Starmer took things down that road! After the Southport attacks, protesters who expressed themselves were vilified - many were arrested under special powers for just standing there, attending. Of course, we have to appreciate there's always a racist thought or some kind of deviant in every group. 

Immigration, Morality Drama and Racism

In December 2024, with Reform UK overtaking Labour in the polls, Starmer quickly jumped on the 'stop the boats' bandwagon, promising to tackle immigration! We should be honest with ourselves, anyone can play the appalled moralist with racial issues. Real racism is more sinister than the many things people prescribe it to be - so why exhaust it? 

Arguably, when racism is used for political gain or a social weapon doesn't it becomes a racist act? We saw the 'racism gameplay' used on the majority of leave voters during brexit. Harry and Meghan’s Netflix show accused the entire UK itself of being a systemically racist country. Do you remember Harry accusing his extended Royal Family only to later call it racial bias instead? But still, all this is a farcry from the skin head I saw on YouTube screaming abuse at a teenage Indian girl!

The Missing Evidence: Where's the Proof Behind These 'Far-Right' Mastermind Claims? 

Immigration scepticism, or even how someone voted in the referendum doesn't necessarily betray anyones views on race. Neither is it a hint of intellectual inferiority. Leave voters were publicly stereotyped across the media as having fewer qualifications, living in rented accommodation, or council housing, and being less travelled. Funnily enough, years later, the same demographic were celebrated as covid keyworkers! What does that tell you? 

When it comes to racism, police were told shelve valid investigation into Islamic grooming gangs stretching across many council estates. This was to avoid being seen as ‘racist’. The anti-racism politics continued, alongside pressures for a nationwide investigation into that very grooming network.  

Absolutely, automatically crying racism is comparable to a grenade that hits everyone. In reality, it's not black and white as it's often packaged; inter-ethnic communities face their own long standing problems too. Ever read about racism in Leicester and Birmingham? The conflicts between Black and South Asian communities shows another perspective on racism. The news broadcasted these clashes and claimed most of which were of a 'cultural and religious nature' (BBC News, 2022). 

Going Back in Time

One example of historical British racial conflicts go back to the Britons and the first English Anglo-Germanic tribes in the fifth century. Different language, culture, religion and genetics, gave them an impression of separate races. It's easy to understand, given how they believed their geneology derived from different ancestral gods. South Asian hostility toward Black people is simply another expression of human beings acting unpleasantly to one another (Gillespie, 2021).

Admittedly, at various protests we can agree that the vocal fervour and conviction of some activists may have came across intimidating; passionate or political chanting can appear aggressive when it isn't. It's like feeling unsafe when we see an intoxicant waving an English flag; we know football hooligans and ethno-nationalists have behaved badly in the passed - they might look similar!

Be that as it is, name calling is a non-crime hate incident which can put you in prison! Too much tarring was going on and most people are still holding a tainted brush. Many protesters in Westminster generally distanced themselves from any far-right ideology and criminal activity, because it was repulsive to them, as you'll see in this honest video below. 

Liars Pretending to Fight a Moral Cause? 

Virtue signaling always adds salt to the wound. It refocuses the optics by framing self-promotion: for example, seeing our Prime Minister playing the saint in the very place where those poor girls were murdered was immoral. Why? The BBC and other mainstream news headlined what occured as 'Not Terror Related'. Starmer denied all knowledge of the guilty party, despite Nigel Farage openly asking, 'What are they not telling us?' Don't be fooled. Starmer knew. 

This Prime Minister knew at the time that those murders were inspired by Islamic radical ideology! That's what he was not telling us! Even when mainstream BBC news packaging the 'suspect' as a 'Welsh' lad because he was born in 'Cardiff'. 

Regardless, we all know officers recovered an Al-Qaeda training PDF, terror related internet searches on his computer and poison. How is this in itself not radical or terror related? The evil wretch was known to authorities and no-one stopped him. Meanwhile, the people had valid reason to protest, because there was a lot to be said, but instead the state arrested them!

The Cover-Up Continues: What Other Facts Were Hidden?

In the Westminster video above, we see protesters, mostly mothers and grandads and so on, indiscriminately herded into police vans! The news, with political help, smeared the lot of them: Westminster certainly was not facing an EDL or NF march! 

An inspection of the police response to the public disorder in July and August 2024 concludes:

No evidence existed to prove any deliberate plot by any group; the actual trouble makers in other protests were done by local people fuelled with anger. They found outside individuals, influencers who kindled public disaffection. They added fuel to the fire with inaccurate information. 

Before 2024 most of the detained rioters and protestors had no previous arrests for disorder-related offences. Police arrested nearly 150 children, some as young as 11. Motives for rioting and protesting were diverse, including fears of poverty, biased policing, as well as concerns surrounding increased immigration. Issues the country voted against repeatedly only for it to be ignored. 

Previously, before these protests, Keir Starmer publicly bent the knee in support of Black Lives Matter, whose vandalism swept the globe. 

The Dangers of the Left

Ultimately, we know that pandering to any particular demographic for votes in an election is a discriminatory practice, questionable at least. It's also questionable that no national inquiry was undertaken on the grooming gangs for so long! For years newspapers, and now, online whistle blowers, claim postal voting fraud was directly linked to the Labour party and the Islamic community. It's hard to know what to believe anymore. Watch the video below! 

Dishonesty and Using Race as a Weapon

In a televised broadcast, Keir Starmer admitted to knowing the details of the Southport case at the time - his excuse: it was ‘not right’ to release details to the public at the time. The police released those details just three months later, in October. This was long before the trial. So, why did Keir Starmer, a successful legal expert respond the way he did?

My Conclusion

Starmer has avoided answering questions about the non-far-right, those peaceful participants in the protests who were made out to be the EDL. Why? People suffered; death in a jail cell for tweeting on social media. Pensioners lost winter allowances, the government demonised those for holding anti illegal immigration views, despite banning needed workers from entering legally. 

What we have seen is U-turn after U-turn and lashings of hypocrisy. I doubt this is about racism, or far right and left etcetera but something else. Starmer said women could have a penis until the law changed his mind. His premiership continued to free up prison spaces by releasing prisoners early. Of course, as we know, he replaced them with hundreds of innocent people found guilty of 'thought crime,' 'facebook posts they didn't like' or even 'holding a placard' against genocide. 

Strangely though, if any left-wing political figure publicly ordered throats cut or openly yelled 'deaf to the IDF' on stage at a televised concert, well... no sentencing. Maybe the plan was to make prisons a tad more Bingo and Werthers Original? I feel as if this is that same old sneaky classism again! Not the boats but the boardroom! It's a game of money, wealth, power played against us by those in high places. The ideas Westminster convey through internet and television divide and weaken us. Perhaps this isn't merely one or two stupid parties but the Fabians or other Elite powers? 

The ship is going down. 

References

BBC News. (2022). "Leicester and Birmingham Ethnic Tensions." Retrieved from [BBC News](https://www.bbc.com/news).

Gillespie, S. (2021). "Ethnic Tensions and Prejudices in the UK." *Journal of Ethnic Studies*, 12(3), 45-62.

HMICFRS (2024) Police response to public disorder in July and August 2024 (Tranche 2). Available at: https://hmicfrs.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/publication-html/police-response-to-public-disorder-in-july-and-august-2024-tranche-2/#:~:text=The%20risk%20online%20content%20poses,content%20could%20contain%20vital%20intelligence. (Accessed: 24 May 2025).

Sproston, K., et al. (2018). "Educational Disparities Among Minority Students." *British Educational Research Journal*, 44(4), 679-695.

Amy Bradley is Missing: Vanishing From a Cruise Ship

Talking About Amy Bradley: A Netflix Shocker (Spoilers) 

3 min read 

A Cynical View Minus The Bollocks

Netflix paints the Amy Bradley case as a deep mystery, but, at the same time it is structured with a very likely outcome. 

The Boring Explanation is Most Likely

Not long after the Netflix show announces her disappearance it hurls in a local, someone quite familiar with the sea's current! Message being: 'We know where a body would wash up, none did,' computer imagery helped to convey their claim. 

We learn Mr and Mrs Bradley pushed to have all passengers grounded until their 23 year old Amy was found. Their request was denied. The staff did do something; a deep search after the passengers disembarked - it was to no avail. She had already left. Look, I know I'm being a tad boring here by saying she took herself off the ship - but why did she?

Sidestepping Netflix

I watched Alister Yellow Douglas, who was cleared by the FBI. The man spoke on YouTube in an interview. and he was very believable. Obviously, I think he is innocent of Amy's disapearence. He directly said Amy told him that her parents made her go on the cruise because she was gay! He said the comment confused him at the time, it would, and it struck a chord with me! The parents shared one bedroom; Amy, a grown-ass woman, also kept her own flat! What the fuck? 

You can see the prevailing waves of doubt across online discussion boards all centring in on Mum and Dad. Someone astutely asked, 'why did the Dad jump straight into a 'Amy is in danger' mentality simply because he didn't notice her that morning?' Netflix was right to bring them deeper into the narrative. According to long term followers of the case less was known about the parents and the dynamics until the show.

Netflix did allude to tensions during the trip of several occasions. Her sexual orientation was a significant issue and key! Her father sent Amy's ex-partner a negative three page letter to keep away! You see where this is going?

The Crux Of The Situation

Amy smoked, drank heavily, partied hard and became the 'life and soul' pulling in the attention. Why? Well... a witness on the Netflix show said on camera there seemed to be something driving Amy's behaviour, duh! 

Of course, it screams rebellion rather than just having fun. If you're feeling pressured by people who want to change who you are, wouldn't you push back? You might want to distance yourself, you might want to self-medicate? Do you know what I mean? 

What Happened? 

Curaçao in the late 90s was known for drugs and trafficking. I looked it up. Amy had motive to leave the ship, be it a self-medicating thing or an act of defiance, a break from the cruise ship, we could compile a list. 

Tragically, this headstrong young woman walked right onto an unsafe island alone. The FBI had limitations with investigating because they were in international waters, jurisdiction was a barrier. A poverty of Intel hindered progress. 

The Outcome 

We can't rightfully dismiss the witness accounts and photographic evidence that sprung up years later. The FBI analysis concluded it was Amy in those sexualised images. Overboard theories lost credibility. 

Netflix very strongly suggests Amy Bradley survived, eventually imprisoned in a guarded lifestyle. I must confess my love of documentaries. Here's another blogpost based on a Netflix documentary. Netflix love to playfully take viewers on a journey, briefly deceive them or go the scenic route, but this is different. A trafficked victim can face multiple forms of abuse and control - drugs, threats, and if Amy has children they could be used as leverage against her. Netflix is dealing with an ongoing, sensitive case.

That's the reality! A young woman caught between identity and family expectation needed to take a break but she was taken. The real mystery isn't what happened to Amy Bradley, as such. It's about how many other people disappear in similar ways, how we can push our loved ones away, our human nature to put self over other. It's heart breaking! The horrors of human trafficking mean we have to watch out for each other. Every herd has its predator waiting. 

What I reckon...

I have no idea if Amy Bradley is still alive now. Apart from the monsters who took her and their twisted circles, who does? When I wrote my Madeleine McCann blogpost I read Europol and US documents on trafficked children - life expectancy was greatly diminished for them according to data. 

We would all like to see Amy found alive and quickly restored fit and well. Sadly, if we go on the nature of these things the most positive outcomes become more like wishful thinking. Then again, people do defy the odds! 

Anyway, remove all those  assumptions we have of human trafficking, the hear-say and speculation, and it simply leaves us with a strong woman who walked away. Is it a shock anyone might want to escape their claustraphobic homophobic family cruise? 

It's so very sad. Look after yourselves, watch out for your own. Keep safe!