Can political TV Presenters make compelling characters?

Examining Browbeating Breakfast TV in the UK: ‘Nagging at Nigel Farage!’

1 to 2 min read

Stooping Low to Dump on People Doesn't Leave a Good Impression

If you’re going to pull a ‘gotcha’ on someone, you’d better have a valid argument or a solid set of proven facts to back it up. That’s when you pounce like the armed police! When it comes to compelling characters and their forms, political presenters serve as the obnoxious foils who test the grit of the main character of the narrative. In this instance we're looking at Jungs archetypal Jester manifested as the media manipulator. 

Anyway, on the 3rd of October, presenters of 'Good Morning Britain' sneered at MP Nigel Farage full throttle, turning things into an assault of morality, which blatantly came across as a clear political attack! His ‘crime’? Simply suggesting police withheld information about the murder suspect during the Southport riot months ago—the suspect had been arrested and was likely guilty! 

They garnished his comments with the aroma of a delicious conspiracy theory. The Karen and her ethical testicle jabbed at him much like a cheap court prosecution, making out he had stoked flames of tension! It’s like what The Angry Bootneck said in his video: police do withhold info! Ask yourself, why did that Southport monster do it? We still don't know! How is that not police withholding information? 

Everyone knows that 'finding stuff out' is the call of the media! Our press doesn't pride itself on having sod all to report, does it? So why would they put their fruitless investigative journalists and presenters within the same earshot of what Farage had to say? Maybe he had a point and they did not? Nigel suggested information was being withheld because nothing was being disclosed! He was doing a better job than they were! Then he faced an attack on national by politically biased tv presenters. It's like the corrupt city politics of Batman's Gothams in any one of Frank Miller graphic novels! 

So let's take the wind of momentum from this appalled, far-from-right Karens sails, by asking: Did the police open up everything about the Manchester Arena Bomber at the time? No, we had unanswered questions then too! 

• The Salisbury poisoning details were kept under police control
• The information about the mass shooting in Plymouth was quiet
• The stabbing in Reading was kept back
• We saw the same with the London Bridge stabbings
• We all remember how they retained facts about Nicola Bulley! 

Please, feel free to add to this list in the comments! It all shows that the M.O of the police often involves withholding information! Why do some bleeding heart lefties struggle to keep their inflated sense of moral superiority under control? 

UPDATE:

On the 29th October, Reform UK MP Nigel Farage publicly announced that Axel Rudakubana, the Southport murder suspect, was finally charged under the terrorism act 2000, and the biological weapons act 1974. He had poisonous toxins in his home, along with a pdf copy of Al-Qaeda's training manual! The murders of the children were classified as non terror related; sometimes authorities have no idea why people act the way they do and say nothing for legal reasons. 

This is a clear example showing the non-impartiality of biased presenters acting as foils, politicals who spat venom at their guest! 

Good morning britain - Nigel Farage - Susanna Reid - Ed Balls - Propoganda - Day time smelly telly - Lefty Lunacy - Police Withholding Info - Riots - Good morning britain - Nigel Farage - Susanna Reid - Ed Balls - Propoganda - Day time smelly telly - Lefty Lunacy - Police Withholding Info - Riots -